Posted by Wilchiro
Not so long ago, Matt Garza was traded to the Chicago Cubs along with Fernando Perez and Zach Rosscup in exchange for prospects Chris Archer, Hak-Ju Lee, Brandon Guyer, Robinson Chirinos, and Sam Fuld. And while the Cubs were supposedly dealing from depth, the deal was immediately deemed a drastic overpay. Jim Hendry has been known to be a knucklehead general manager in the past, and this trade likely added to that description. But today, I am not here to evaluate the winners and losers of the deal, but rather to evaluate the the centerpiece of the deal, Matt Garza, and to give a briefing on the impact that he should bring to the north side of town.

Matt Garza was supplemented by one of the best defenses in the game. He no longer has that advantage.
To clear the air, this post was not created to criticize Garza, because he is a respectable pitcher. He is a good pitcher, that is for a fact, but he is not elite. He had a solid campaign in 2010 and has really improved as a pitcher overall. He threw a no-hitter in 2010, and a casual baseball fan may even present a case that he has a shot at the 2011 NL Cy Young award based on simple statistics. But in a sabermetric sense, this probably isn’t the case at all. Garza has spent majority of his career with the Tampa Bay Rays, an organization who has always had a keen eye for defense. Evan Longoria, the fifth best defensive 3B in baseball, and Carl Crawford, the second best defensive LF in baseball, have always supplemented Matt Garza, but that advantage no longer remains. The Rays combined team UZR last year was amongst the highest in the league with a mark of 33.3, compared to a slightly above average mark of 2.3 produced from the Cubs. This needs to be taken into account, as this was a large part of Garza’s success factor, as his FIP has consistently been .3- .4 runs higher then his ERA.
While defense has definitely been a key to Garza’s past success, that is not whole story. Garza has a tendency to be a fly ball pitcher, and in Tampa Bay, that wasn’t a glaring issue. But according to the MLB Park Factors for 2010, Tropicana Field was the most pitcher friendly ballpark in baseball, with Wrigley being the third most hitter friendly ballpark, therefore proving that both stadiums are essentially opposites, especially when the wind is blowing out. And to further prove this point, let’s look at Garza’s splits away from his home field, shall we? At home last year, Garza posted above average numbers, sporting an ERA of 3.51. But when Garza didn’t have that coveted home field advantage this year, playing in parks such as Yankee Stadium, Fenway Park, Rogers Centre, and Camden Yards, he posed a 4.27 ERA, good for mediocre at best. And if that’s the kind of production he is going to bring to Wrigley Field this season, Jim Hendry better call for help.
But sometimes, numbers can’t sum it all up. To further extend my point, let’s look at Edwin Jackson, who was traded from the Detroit Tigers to the Arizona Diamondbacks in the offseason of 2010. Jackson pitched in one of the more pitcher friendly ballparks in baseball in Comerica Park, and was relatively lucky, sporting an ERA .5 points lower then his FIP. In a transition to one of the more hitter friendly parks in the MLB, Jackson’s ERA became more of a reality as he posted a 4.47 ERA in 2011.
I hope this post doesn’t mirror to any viewers as an analysis that penalizes Matt Garza. He has some good make-up and he could even be an ace for some teams. But what I am trying to stress here is that Jim Hendry and crew gave up a heap of young talent for him, and facing the facts, Garza just isn’t worth it at this point unless he makes some dramatic changes in his game. But like I mentioned previously, Garza is still at a stage where he can make improvements to his game and become elite. But it won’t come naturally. Garza needs to pray for some help from his defense and cut down on his fly ball rates. If he does that, this deal might just be worth it for the Cubs. If not, the Cubs might have just made a mess of their future, which shouldn’t have happened in the first place.

















